The Flynn Effect is real

The Flynn Effect — the observation that average IQ test scores are rising, and have been doing so, in many industrialised countries throughout the 20th century — has been known about for some time, and it’s been debated whether this is because people are actually getting more intelligent (whatever that means), or whether it’s just an artifact of how IQ tests are measured (e.g. in a society where people have more contact with IQ-test-like puzzles, you might expect their test scores to rise, without any corresponding rise in other cognitive abilities).

Matt McIntosh at Gene Expression notes that here has been physiological changes in the population over this time period which suggests the Flynn Effect corresponds to real increases in intelligence:

To my mind, the most compelling evidence in favor of Flynn Effect gains being real is physiological: it’s well known that there have been increases in height concurrent with increases in intelligence in all the countries where the FE has been operative. What’s less well known is that there have also been recorded increases in cranial capacity […] and in brain size.

Given an increase in brain size and the correlation between IQ and brain size (0.4), it’d be pretty remarkable if there wasn’t any corresponding increase in intelligence. Also, in support of Lynn’s nutrition hypothesis, there have been correlations found in developed countries between IQ and presence of certain micronutrients.

Also, there have been a few studies showing that FE gains tend to be disproportionately located at the left half of the curve rather than the right, which is the nutrition theory would predict given that the less bright people tend to be poorer and thus benefit more than the wealthier (who tend to be smarter) from nutritive improvements.

So there you have it — we really are cleverer than our ancestors.

This entry was posted in biology, cognitive science, science. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Flynn Effect is real

  1. I’m sorry, but IQ tests aren’t measuring ‘intelligence’. They measure math skills, reading skills, an individual’s knowledge and understanding of the dominant culture that developed the test and most importantly they finely quantify an individual’s performance on a multiple choice test. The people who do best on them are the people who have a cultural background most similar to that of the people who developed them.

    Of course, I have an IQ of 87, so what do I know?

  2. cabalamat says:

    Winstondelgado: I’m sorry, but IQ tests aren’t measuring ‘intelligence’.

    I mostly agree. What IQ tests actually measure is ability to do IQ tests. And if the only evidence in support of the theory that people are cleverer today was IQ test scores, I would be very sceptical about that theory.

    But when there is other evidence, e.g. increased height, increased cranial capacity, different shape of cranium, increased brain size, micronutrients, etc, then the theory has a lot more weight to it, in my opinion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s